[Stay on top of transportation news: Get TTNews in your inbox.]
Absent a settlement before EQT Corp.’s annual meeting in Pittsburgh on July 10, shareholders will decide between competing rosters of candidates for the board of directors. One slate was nominated by EQT, while the other is backed by Toby and Derek Rice, the thirtysomething brothers leading a group of dissident investors who want to overhaul the company.
Less than two years after EQT took the top spot among U.S. gas producers with its $6 billion purchase of the Rices’ former company, Rice Energy Inc., the two sides are locked in a bitter dispute. The brothers, who say EQT has underperformed since the acquisition, want a board majority and aim to install Toby Rice as CEO.
Though activists rarely grab a board majority through a proxy battle, the Rices’ push may be an exception: They already have won the backing of several large investors and two shareholder advisory firms. The brothers, who have used the term “shalennial” to describe their management style, own about 3% of EQT.
The conflict between the Rices and EQT hinges on a wider issue for the industry. While U.S. gas drillers have been remarkably successful at ramping up output and turning the country into a net exporter, their track record of doing so profitably has been mixed at best, causing many investors to sour on the sector. The Rices say they’ll implement better technology and revamp EQT’s organizational structure to drill wells more efficiently.
“[If investors] vote the Rice brothers in, the kind of change they are voting for is a pretty dramatic shakeup,” Sameer Panjwani, an analyst at Tudor Pickering Holt & Co. in Houston, said July 3. “The message they have been campaigning for has been enhanced free cash flow, and that is really the main thing the market is looking for today. That’s definitely why they have traction.”
The Rices have cast EQT, founded in 1888 as Equitable Gas Co., as a driller hearkening back to a “bygone era” by offering its top brass lavish perks such as company-paid country club dues and the use of a private aircraft for an interim CEO. They say that EQT is the highest-cost producer in the Appalachian Basin — an area that includes the Marcellus shale play, the biggest U.S. gas formation.
EQT’s shares tumbled 39% last year as the company lowered production targets and boosted its budget, citing operating inefficiencies after the Rice acquisition. The driller underperformed the S&P exploration and production index, which fell 29%.
The Rices’ push for changes at EQT “started because the largest shareholders reached out to us and they wanted us to help fix the business,” Toby Rice said June 28. “We are innovators, there is no doubt about it, and we continue to stay on the cutting edge.”
Another Rice brother, Daniel, is on the EQT board after having gained a seat with EQT’s purchase of Rice Energy in 2017.
The Rices have the support of at least one-fifth of EQT investors, including the largest shareholder, T. Rowe Price Group Inc. The brothers also have won the backing of D.E. Shaw & Co., Kensico Capital Management Corp., Elliott Management Corp. and Tortoise, along with proxy advisory firms Institutional Shareholder Services Inc. and Egan-Jones Ratings Co.
For its part, EQT says it already has taken steps to transform the company and refresh its board since the Rice deal, replacing nine of its 12 directors since 2017. The driller cut debt by more than $500 million in the fourth quarter of last year and first quarter of 2019, and last month said that it was on track to generate as much as $400 million of free cash flow this year.
Electing the Rice slate would result in “a weaker board and managerial chaos,” according to EQT, which also has said Toby Rice isn’t fit to lead a public company.
“The plan that we have put forward is one that’s based in reality,” Rob McNally, CEO of EQT, said in May. “The Rice plan really ignores some business fundamentals.”
EQT’s board slate has the backing of proxy advisory firm Glass Lewis & Co., as well as the five independent board candidates supported by both EQT and the Rice group.
Regardless of the outcome of the proxy battle, the dispute underscores how explorers are struggling to attract capital amid concerns about profitability, according to Katie Bays, co-founder of Washington-based consulting firm Sandhill Strategy.
“The proxy fight with EQT could ultimately be a negative for the industry overall,” Bays said July 3. “You create an Icarus problem where companies get bigger, they fly closer to the sun and they get more scrutiny from investors.”