Ergonomics Rules' Effects Misgauged by OSHA, ATA Argues

WASHINGTON — The Occupational Safety and Health Administration underestimates the negative effects that its ergonomic rules would have on trucking, according to trucking’s largest lobbying group.

Related Stories

dotErgonomics Hearings In Second Round (March 29)

dotOpinion: Ergonomics Rules – Right Time (March 13)

dotOpinion: Costly Solution in Search of a Problem (March 7)



(Note: To return to this story, click the "Back" button on your browser.)

An American Trucking Associations official presented trucking’s position during an April 7 hearing, one of a long series of OSHA-sponsored hearings that started in March. The agency has estimated that its regulatory proposal would prevent 3 million musculoskeletal injuries, mostly related to lifting and repetitive motion, in American work places over the next 10 years.

Also at issue during the hearing was whether the railroad industry would be subject to the new federal regulations.

TTNews Message Boards
ATA argued that trucking should not be covered by OSHA’s ergonomics rules because it operates under unique conditions. Moreover, trucking has already addressed many of the problems, ATA told the agency panel.

For the full story, see the Apr. 17 print edition of Transport Topics. Subscribe today.