[Stay on top of transportation news: Get TTNews in your inbox.]
U.S.-Canada trade talks broke down over heavy-duty trucks
Canada wanted auto tariff relief extended to trucks
A truck en route to Canada via the Gordie Howe International Bridge in Detroit on July 27. (Jeff Kowalsky/Bloomberg)
Key Takeaways:
- U.S.-Canada trade talks collapsed after a dispute over reducing U.S. tariffs on Canadian medium- and heavy-duty vehicles, people familiar with negotiations said.
- The proposed deal would have cut auto tariffs to 15% from 25%, but disagreement over truck relief helped derail broader tariff reductions.
- The breakdown led to new 50% U.S. tariffs on about $20 billion in Canadian goods and Canada plans counter-tariffs starting Sept. 8.
Trade talks between the U.S. and Canada collapsed Aug. 21 in part amid a last-minute standoff over cutting U.S. tariffs on Canadian medium- and heavy-duty vehicles, people familiar with the matter said.
Both countries had the outline of a deal, which would have lowered U.S. sectoral tariffs on autos, steel, aluminum and lumber, and were locked in talks Aug. 21. But the two sides remained at odds over the treatment of larger vehicles, the people said, speaking on condition of anonymity to describe private negotiations.
READ MORE: U.S. disputes Canada’s account of heavy-truck tariff talks
The Canadians insisted on the additional relief in a phone call late Aug. 21, and the Americans balked, the people said.
Under the deal the two countries were working toward, the regular auto tariff would have been lowered to 15% from the current 25%. Canada wanted that relief expanded to medium- and heavy-duty vehicles, which typically range from large pickup trucks to commercial vehicles, they said.
Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney said Aug. 22 that to deny such relief to trucks “is a big change, obviously.”
Carney said without the tariff relief on trucks, Ford’s new plant in Ontario, which makes F-350s and larger pickup trucks “would have been excluded. No rationale,” he added.
We've been over this.
The 'importer of record' pays the tariffs.
A threatened US tariff on Canadian auto parts will be paid by US auto assembly.
Without those specific parts, auto assembly throughout the US would halt.
US auto assembly will be on the phone to the WH today. — Flavio Volpe, C.M. (@FlavioVolpe1) August 24, 2026
The U.S. considered this request to be an additional demand that wasn’t part of the deal, the people said.
But one Canadian industry official said it was the Americans who tried to divide the industry.
“At the last minute, the Americans pulled that classification out of the class of product that would get a reduced tariff,” Flavio Volpe, president of the Automotive Parts Manufacturers’ Association, told the Canadian Broadcasting Corp. on Aug. 22, referring to super-duty pickup trucks such as the Ford F-350s.
Volpe suggested the impetus may have been to “get rid of auto manufacturing in Canada.”
Both sides blamed the other for the sudden collapse of talks, which resulted in the U.S. imposing new 50% tariffs on about $20 billion in Canadian goods. Carney on Saturday announced dollar-for-dollar counter-tariffs on American goods starting Sept. 8.
Lana Payne, national president of Canada’s largest private-sector union, Unifor, told reporters Aug. 22 that Canada had no choice but to draw a line in the sand.
We can’t trade good jobs for a bad deal that would cement unjust, industry-killing tariffs,” says Unifor's @Lanampayne. “It was clear the never-ending list of concession demands were untenable.” https://t.co/rs54u3rvgy — Unifor (@UniforTheUnion) August 22, 2026
She said autoworkers were concerned that agreeing to a tariff carveout on U.S. parts only would lead to more aggressive demands when negotiating the wider North American trade pact.
“And eventually you’re getting away from being able to have a competitive sector in Canada. And that was really problematic,” she added.
Unifor had told the Carney government that it wanted auto parts compliant with the existing North American trade deal to be exempt from tariffs.
Carney’s office declined to comment, while the White House and the office of the U.S. Trade Representative didn’t immediately respond to a request for comment.