Editorial: Open the Borders
The 1993 trade pact sets out the rules and timetable for when and how trucks from the United States, Mexico and Canada were to have been allowed to ply each other’s roads, so long as they are hauling international — not domestic — freight. But the United States has delayed the plan at every turn, and apparently is soon to be punished for it.
Related Stories | |
Panel to USA: Open Roads To Mexico’s Truck Firms (Dec. 4) Mexican Trucking Tells Fox of Nafta Concerns (July 17) Government Has Few Facts About Mexican Truckers (April 17) California Finds Mexican Trucks Comparable With U.S. Carriers (April 17) | |
Shop Online | |
The preliminary ruling by the panel, issued Nov. 29, is expected to be finalized in January after both sides have had a chance to respond to the decision.
If the ruling stands — and there’s no reason to think it won’t — the U.S. faces fines equivalent to the amount of the economic damage the panel says was inflicted on the Mexican trucking industry by the U.S. actions.
President Clinton refused to meet two important deadlines contained in Nafta — to open the four southwestern border states to Mexican trucks in 1995, and to open all of the U.S. to all truckers from Mexico in January 2000.
Clinton cited safety concerns as his reason for not complying with Nafta even though the provision lets the U.S. enforce its own safety regulations on foreign trucks that cross its borders.
There is evidence that the entire safety issue is a red herring, pushed by the Teamsters union, to keep Mexican trucks out.
According to California Highway Patrol inspections, Mexican trucks entering California commercial zones along the border were at least as safe as American trucks examined by CHP in 1998. That year, the CHP inspection failure rate was 27% for Mexican trucks and 28% for domestic rigs. A year later, the domestic failure rate improved to 23%, while the Mexican rate remained at 27%.